@extends('layouts.lg-pdf2')
@section ('content')
<div class="row">
  <p class="span-red">My current Legally acquired lawful Social Security Number last four is and only is &nbsp;<span class="span-ul">{{$universal['ssn']}}</span></p>
</div>
<div class="row">
  <p>*I demand that any OTHER reported personal identifier information be removed from reporting as it does NOT MATCH EXACTLY my true current CORRECT information EXACTLY as I have detailed above. It is MY RIGHT to DENY YOU AUTHORITY TO REPORT DEFICIENT of factual verifiability of validation of only TRUE CORRECT COMPLETE TIMELY CLAIMS which as well are CERTIFIABLY COMPIANT IN their reporting, even to the mandatorily perfect and certified METRO 2 format reporting standard(s) of compliance! </p>
</div>
<div class="row">
  <p class="span-blue">My Personal Tracking Number is &nbsp; <span class="span-ul">{{$universal['p_tracking_number']}}</span></p>
</div>
<div class="row">
  <p class="span-blue">TO: &nbsp; <span class="span-ul">{{$destination}}</span></p>
</div>
<div class="row">
  <p>Re: Unproven, Invalid, Not Compliantly reported or else wise Unauthorized Credit claims of delinquency and or derogatoriness’s despite significant deficiencies of claim’s truth, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, ownership, verifiability, validity and certifiable compliant reporting else wiseeach deficiency requires immediate and permanent removal of claim’s reporting or else is a infraction of reporting regulations and standards of compliant reporting(s).</p>
</div>

  <div class="row">
    <h1 class="span-ul2">To Whom it Concerns,</h1>
  </div>
  <div class="row">
    <p >I recently submitted a request for investigation of an Acct Number: {accnum1}, which you refused. I submitted enough information for you to carry out a reasonable investigation of my dispute, since you obviously did not investigate this account thoroughly enough the last time, I submitted one. If you had investigated properly, rather than use e-Oscar system, you would have known, that not only I have never been late on this account, but that I am not sure that the account is even mine - through your company claims to have "verified" this. To best resolve this matter, I demand that you become certifiably compliant in your reporting of any injurious delinquency and or derogatoriness versus me, be it true or not as no item questionable can be assumed validated and or certifiably perfect and compliant in its every reporting of its claim(s). Eradicate immediately and permanently the following misinformation as currently reporting in vile dereliction of regulations and standards of adequate compliant reporting, a minimal criterion of it even:
    </p>

    @include('lg.pdf.partial.content')
  <p>It is at this time that I will point out that in Cushman vs TransUnion, Stevenson vs TRW (Experian), and Richardson vs Fleet, Equifax, et al, the courts ruled each and every time that the CRA couldn't merely "parrot" information from the creditors and collection agencies...that they have to conduct an independent REASONABLE investigation to ensure the validity of the debt and honestly/integrity of the creditors/CA in question. Sending out a generic form through the e-Oscar system that does not even contain my reasons for the dispute is not reasonable. If you do not initiate an investigation regarding my dispute, as is my right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, I will have to take legal action to protect my credit rating and myself. As I'm sure you are aware, each violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows damages of $1000 should this matter end up in court. I look forward to an expedient resolution of this matter, </p>

  </div>


  @include('lg.pdf.partial.bottom-info')


  @include('lg.pdf.partial.img_bottom')
@endsection