initial commit

resources/views/lg/pdf/22.blade.php

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+@extends('layouts.lg-pdf2')
+@section ('content')
+
+<div class="row">
+  <p class="span-red">My current Legally acquired lawful Social Security Number last four is and only is &nbsp;<span class="span-ul">{{$universal['ssn']}}</span></p>
+</div>
+<div class="row">
+  <p>*I demand that any OTHER reported personal identifier information be removed from reporting as it does NOT MATCH EXACTLY my true current CORRECT information EXACTLY as I have detailed above. It is MY RIGHT to DENY YOU AUTHORITY TO REPORT DEFICIENT of factual verifiability of validation of only TRUE CORRECT COMPLETE TIMELY CLAIMS which as well are CERTIFIABLY COMPIANT IN their reporting, even to the mandatorily perfect and certified METRO 2 format reporting standard(s) of compliance! </p>
+</div>
+<div class="row">
+  <p class="span-blue">My Personal Tracking Number is &nbsp; <span class="span-ul">{{$universal['p_tracking_number']}}</span></p>
+</div>
+<div class="row">
+  <p class="span-blue">TO: &nbsp; <span class="span-ul">{{$destination}}</span></p>
+  <p class="span-red">AND </p>
+  <p style="font-weight:bold;">Experian North America, ATTN: Ann Sterling <br>Vice President and Assistant General Counsel<br>Office of the Corporate Counsel<br>475 Anton Blvd.<br> Costa Mesa, CA 92626<br> </p>
+
+</div>
+<div class="row">
+  <p>RE: Consumer notice to repository of suspected COMPLIANCE FAILURE reporting inquiry(ies) deficient of the mandatory physically verifiable proof of adequately acquired lawful Permissible Purpose and consumer DEMAND for repository to CHECK for COMPLIANCE OF REPORTING even to the required Metro 2 format reporting standards for alleged true, accurate, complete, timely , undoubtedly valid claim of inquiry. Consumer contests the report-ability due to deficiencies of or in proof of the requisite certified compliant reporting of only factually validated and verified claim(s), be it true or be it not!</p>
+</div>
+
+  <div class="row">
+    <h1 class="span-ul2">To Whom it Concerns,</h1>
+  </div>
+  <div class="row">
+    <p >Recently, I contacted your firm with a formal consumer complaint challenging reported claim(s) under the <strong>FCRA 611 (a) (7)</strong>.  Included as well in addition of that check for compliant reporting, I sent a formal written validation demand to the Creditor for the Inquiry that you are reporting. I received back a denial of process and an assertion that the records of the inquiry (ies) reported were in fact UNAVAILABLE, or so they claimed!  No matter if you or a third party has collected this information, you must have an adequate record to legally substantiate the claim(s), if not it(they)  is/are UNVERIFIEABLE, invalid, or not factually certified compliantly reported (even to the mandatory Metro 2 format standards) or ANY OTHER DEFICIENCY OF FACTUAL REPORTING and or process of reporting then said allegations are unfit and therefore CANNOT be LEGALLY  reported.  Tort law is quite clear in this matter!  You have NO MORE THAN 5 days to DELETE the ITEM and provide me with written verification of that DELETION for my records. If you choose not to, I will have no choice but commence the unpleasantness of a Section <strong class="span-simple-ul">1024.35 (Notice of Error) under Regulation X of the CFPB regulatory reform guidelines for Credit Reporting Agencies.</strong>
+      <br>Below listed are the questionable if not altogether erroneous inquiries you are reporting, each of which REQUIRES ERADICATION from reporting IMMEDIATELY and PERMANENTLY:
+      </p>
+
+    @include('lg.pdf.partial.content')
+
+  </div>
+  <div class="row">
+    <p>Sincerely,</p>
+  </div>
+
+  @include('lg.pdf.partial.bottom-info')
+  @include('lg/pdf/partial/bottom-cc')
+  @include('lg.pdf.partial.img_bottom')
+@endsection